Drawing for 21

USPTO serial 77802014

21

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 21?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claire M. Kimball

Claire M. Kimball TBS, Inc., Legal Dept., Trademark GroupOne CNN Center, 10 Northc/o Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.Atlanta, GA 30303

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Cable television and satellite broadcasting services, streaming of audio, video and audio/video materials over the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 15, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 15, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 15, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 8, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 14, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance