Drawing for LOS ANGELES COMIC-CON

USPTO serial 77802153

LOS ANGELES COMIC-CON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOS ANGELES COMIC-CON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter K. Hahn

PETER K. HAHN PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP501 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 1100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3575UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education and entertainment services, namely, organizing and conducting conventions in the fields of animation, comic books and popular artACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 14, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 14, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 14, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance