USPTO serial 77802567
THE SCHATZ TECHNIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3795278Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2010
- Examiner
- BRODSKY, AARON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SCHATZ TECHNIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlottesville, VA
Charlottesville, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian B. Darville
BRIAN B. DARVILLE BROCADIANT PLLCPO BOX 320670ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-4670UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Pain prevention and treatment therapy services, namely, physical exploration and manipulation of tissue for the prevention and treatment of pain; providing information in the field of pain prevention and treatment therapy via an online website accessible through a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 27, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 25, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |