Drawing for SPRING LOFT

USPTO serial 77803654

SPRING LOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPRING LOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy B. Berge

AMY B. BERGE GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC101 South Fifth Street3500 NATIONAL CITY TOWERLOUISVILLE, KY 40202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024comforters, down comforters, bed blankets, down blankets, mattress covers, mattress pads, foam mattress pads, duvets, bed sheetsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 22, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 18, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 2, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 11, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 9, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance