USPTO serial 77803921
WWW.VINTAGETUB.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WWW.VINTAGETUB.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountaintop, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Goldschmidt, Jr.
JOHN W. GOLDSCHMIDT, JR. DILWORTH PAXSON LLP1500 MARKET ST STE 3500EPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | DISHWASHERS AND GARBAGE DISPOSALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | KITCHEN AND BATHROOM PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATHTUBS, SHOWERS, SINKS, TOILETS, BIDETS, FURNITURE, CABINETS, MIRRORS AND VANITIES; PLUMBING FIXTURES, NAMELY, SINK TRAPS, FAUCETS, DRAINS, AND WATER SUPPLY LINES FOR BATHTUBS, SINKS AND TOILETS; LIGHTING, NAMELY, LAMPS, SCONCES, PENDANT LIGHTING FIXTURES, AND FLUSH MOUNTED LIGHTING FIXTURES; APPLIANCES, NAMELY, COOKING RANGES, RANGE HOODS AND VENTILATION HOODS; APPARATUS FOR COOKING, NAMELY, COOKTOPS, MICROWAVE OVENS, AND WALL OVENS; APPARATUS FOR REFRIGERATION, NAMELY, REFRIGERATORS, REFRIGERATED WINE COOLERS, REFRIGERATED DRAWERS, BEVERAGE REFRIGERATORS; AND APPARATUS FOR MAKING ICE, NAMELY, ICE MAKERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |