USPTO serial 77804137
ABS ASIA BROADCAST SATELLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABS ASIA BROADCAST SATELLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
DAVID J BYER K&L GATES LLPSTATE STREET FINANCIAL CENTERONE LINCOLN STREETBOSTON, MA 02111-2901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Satellite bandwidth services; satellite transmission services and satellite communication services; radio broadcasting; Internet telecommunication services, namely, providing telecommunications connections to the Internet; mobile data network telecommunication services, namely, network transmission of data through local computer networks and network transmission of data through satellites; mobile Internet telecommunication services, namely, Internet access provider services | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |