Drawing for PELIGROSO

USPTO serial 77804311

PELIGROSO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PELIGROSO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Powley

304 HUDSON ST FL 2NEW YORK, NY 10013-1027UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025T-shirts, caps, fleece pullovers, fleece jackets, sweatshirts, hats and beaniesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 31, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 3, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 3, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 3, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 6, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 4, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 4, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 4, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 16, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 16, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 12, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 11, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 11, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 4, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 24, 2009GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 24, 2009GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 24, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance