Drawing for 0

USPTO serial 77804521

0

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 0?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher N. Hunter

Christopher N. Hunter Norton Rose Canada LLP200 Bay Street, Suite 3800Royal Bank Plaza, South TowerToronto, ON, M5J2Z4

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Fuel transfer systems comprised of portable fuel containers made from plastic; portable fuel containers made from plasticACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 21, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 29, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 28, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 25, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance