USPTO serial 77805767
MY LINH A TASTE OF VIETNAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4192348Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2012
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MY LINH A TASTE OF VIETNAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
My Linh A Taste of Vietnam, Inc.
Albany, NY
My Linh A Taste of Vietnam, Inc.
Albany, NY
My Linh A Taste of Vietnam, Inc.
Albany, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maxine L. Barasch
Maxine L. Barasch DREAMWEAVER LAW, PLLC300 GREAT OAKS BLVD#300-029ALBANY, NY 12203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Soups, namely, soybean based, seiten, gluten based, wheat free vegetarian, chicken, meat, seafood, fruit, dairy, noodle based soups, ] congee based soups, and vegetable based soups [ ; salads, namely, vegetable salads, fruit salads, fruit and vegetable salads, meat salads, seafood salads, pomelo salad, grapefruit salad, beet salad, tofu salad, lotus root salad, cucumber salad, mango salad, papaya salad, chicken and cabbage salad, grilled shrimp and watercress salad; prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables, soups, fruit salads and vegetable salads; packaged cooked fruits and vegetables; fermented vegetables; pickled vegetables; pickled vegetables in soy sauce, soybean paste or vinegar; preserved fruits and vegetables; processed vegetables, namely, cooked cucumber, daikon, mushrooms, bellflower root, spinach, soybean sprouts and bracken fern stems; vegetable yogurts; packaged ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of seafood, poultry, meat, game, and vegetarian products; Vegetarian products, namely, processed soy beans, seitan, processed vegetables, tofu, and tempeh; prepared and packaged vegetable-based entrees; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; prepared vegetable-based entrees; combination meals consisting primarily of a meat or vegetable-based entrée and a soup or salad; seafood, poultry, meat, and game; dairy-based beverages; fruit-based food beverage; milk based beverages containing fruit juice; milk beverages containing fruits; bakery desserts consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; nut products, namely, blanched nuts, candied nuts, nut topping, prepared nuts, roasted nuts, seasoned nuts, and shelled nuts; prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables, soups, fruit salads and vegetable salads; cooked fruits and vegetables; cut fruits packaged in plastic cups; dehydrated fruit snacks; dried fruit and vegetables; fruits in preserved form; fruit-based food beverage; fruit-based snack food; milk based beverages containing fruit juice; pickled fruits ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 2008 |
| 030 | [ Dried herbs; extracts used as flavorings, namely, vanilla extract, pandan extract; Vietnamese deli products, namely, summer rolls, spring rolls, and sandwiches; prepared food products, namely, vermicelli noodles and rice; beverages, namely, coffee, tea, hot or iced coffee with cream, milk, or condensed milk, hot or iced teas with cream, milk, or condensed milk; tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; desserts, namely, flan or egg custards, cake, pastry, cookies; dessert puddings; flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; maize-based pudding dessert (mazamorra morada); rice-based pudding dessert; frozen yogurt with fruit topping; coconut extract ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by My Linh A Taste of Vietnam, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by My Linh A Taste of Vietnam, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by My Linh A Taste of Vietnam, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MY LINH A TASTE OF VIETNAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |