USPTO serial 77806330
SCREENPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2010
- Examiner
- PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCREENPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SANTA CLARA, CA
SANTA CLARA, CA
Loanhead, Midlothian, GB
Loanhead, Midlothian, GB
Loanhead, Midlothian, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alina S. Morris
ALINA S. MORRIS KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-8214UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in gene analysis in life science research and molecular diagnostics; computer software for screening, testing and analyzing DNA samples; computer software for use in determining the size and relative quantity of DNA fragments in a test sample | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Lab901 Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Lab901 Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Lab901 Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SCREENPLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 25, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |