Drawing for CLOUDCOVER

USPTO serial 77806587

CLOUDCOVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOUDCOVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chris A. Caseiro

CHRIS A. CASEIRO VERRILL DANA, LLP1 PORTLAND SQPORTLAND, ME 04101-4057UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business research services, namely, consumer marketing research services for others in the nature of gathering consumer information about social networks, and in particular about social networking customers and about how they, and products and services of interest and the customers' competitors are perceived by consumers participating in, and influenced by, social media, analyzing the consumer information gathered and reporting it to clients, creating and executing strategies and plans to improve or otherwise modify those consumer perceptions, identifying new product and service ideas and offerings based on the consumer information gathered, providing reports of comparisons to how the customers' competitors are perceived in the social networks monitored, providing reports identifying key influencers in the social networks monitored, and providing websites and/or webpages at which customers can review the reports and the consumer information gatheredACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 1, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 18, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 21, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance