Drawing for SMARTRASTER

USPTO serial 77806767

SMARTRASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTRASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William P. Jensen

WILLIAM P JENSEN CRAIN CATON & JAMES1401 MCKINNEY STSTE 1700HOUSTON, TX 77010-1079

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Scientific research in the fields of oil and gas well log data; compiling data for research purposes in the fields of oil and gas well log data, geophysical exploration and well logging; providing on-line well log data in the field of oil and gas well logging via a global computer networkACTIVENov 23, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 22, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 22, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 7, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 7, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 7, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 7, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 27, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 27, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 28, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 28, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 21, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance