Drawing for LIME GREEN

USPTO serial 77806873

LIME GREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIME GREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Howard

JAMES E. HOWARD BSH HOME APPLIANCES CORPORATION100 BOSCH BLVDNEW BERN, NC 28562-6924UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Household and kitchen machines and equipment, namely, electric apparatus for making coffee; heating, steam producing, and cooking devices, namely, electric coffee percolators; hot-keeping apparatus, namely, electric coffee machines; coffee making apparatus, namely, electric coffee machines and electric espresso making apparatus; coffee dispensers, namely, electric coffee pots; and structural replacement parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 6, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 5, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 5, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance