USPTO serial 77808246
STAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pyrmont NSW 2009, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald P. Schneeweis
GERALD P. SCHNEEWEIS MORRIS POLICH & PURDY LLP501 W BROADWAY STE 500SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3520UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Merchandising services in this class relating to casinos, gambling, gaming, clubs, conferences, seminars, live performances, entertainment including stage shows and discotheques, sporting and cultural activities; the provision of retailing services as part of exhibition, function room, hotel services, accommodation and casino facilities; loyalty incentive programs for gamblers, casino and gaming customers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education, entertainment and providing of training services all relating to stage shows and discotheques; sporting and cultural activities including casino gambling, and club services and gaming; conducting of conferences, seminars and live performances | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Provision of food and drink, provision of conference, exhibition and function room facilities, hotel services and merchandising; accommodation and accommodation reservation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |