USPTO serial 77809685
RUBKIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUBKIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Taipei City, TW
Taipei City, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Ditico
WAN HSIEN NENG2F NO 7 LINE 237WANDA ROAD WAN HUATAIPEI CITY, 10878Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Adhesive bras, Adult novelty gag clothing item, namely, socks, After ski boots, Albs, American football bibs, Anglers' shoes, Ankle boots, Ankle garters, Ankle socks, Anorak, Anti-perspirant socks, Apres-ski shoes, Aprons, Ascots, Athletic footwear, Athletic shoes, Athletic uniforms, A-shirts, Babushkas, Baby bibs not of paper, Baby bodysuits, Baby bottoms, Baby bunting, Baby doll pyjamas, Baby layettes for clothing, Baby tops, Balaclavas, Ball gowns, Ballet shoes, Ballet slippers, Balloon pants, Ballroom dancing shoes, Bandanas, Bandeaux, Barber smocks, Baseball caps, Baseball shoes, Baseball uniforms, Baselayer bottoms, Baselayer tops, Basketball sneakers, Bath slippers, Bathing caps, Bathing costumes, Bathing costumes, Bathing costumes for women, Bathing suits, Bathing suits for men, Beach shoes, Beachwear, Bib shorts, Boxing shoes, Canvas shoes, Coats, Climbing footwear, Climbing boots, Cycling shoes, Deck-shoes, Footwear, Footwear for women, Footwear made of wood, Footwear not for sports, Frocks, Gloves, Golf shoes, Hiking boots, Hockey shoes, Hoods, Jackets and socks, Jeans, Jerkins, Jodhpurs, Jogging outfits, Jumpers, Kilts, Kimonos, Knee highs, Knee-high stockings, Lace boots, Ladies' boots, Layettes, Leather shoes, Loungewear, Lounge pants, Men's socks, Miniskirts, Mittens, Moccasins, Mocknecks, Motorcyclist boots, Mountaineering boots, Mountaineering shoes, Overalls, Overcoats, Overshoes, Pajama bottoms, Pants, Ponchos, Pram suits, Rain boots, Riding boots, Robes, Rompers, Ruanas, Rubber shoes, Sabots, Serapes, Shoe dowels, Shoe inserts for primarily non-orthopedic purposes, Shoe pegs, Shoe soles, Shoe straps, Shoes, Shoe soles for repair, Short overcoat for kimono, Short petticoats, Short sets, Short trousers, Shortalls, Shorts, Ski boot bags, Ski boots, Skooters, Skiwear, Skorts, Sneakers, Snow boots, Snow pants, Soccer boots, Soccer shoes, Socks, Tap shoes, Teddies, Tennis shoes, Tips for footwear, Water socks, Winter boots, Women's shoes, Wooden shoes, Woollen socks, Work shoes and boots | ABANDONED | Mar 15, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |