USPTO serial 77809759
ADEYAKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADEYAKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP
Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micol Cecchi
Micol Cecchi Nissan North America, Inc.P.O. Box 685001Franklin, TN 37068-5001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing on-line chat rooms and forums for transmission of messages among computer users in the fields of automobiles, fashion, entertaining and style | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 31, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |