Drawing for GREEN DEBATE

USPTO serial 77809794

GREEN DEBATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCRAY, RENEE
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN DEBATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph R. Marcus

JOSEPH R. MARCUS HUSCH BLACKWELL SANDERS WELSH & KATZ120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ FL 22CHICAGO, IL 60606-3912UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PRINTED MATERIALS, NAMELY, PERIODICALLY PUBLISHED MAGAZINE IN THE FIELDS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND HOTEL, RESORT, HOSPITALITY AND RESTAURANT INDUSTRIES; SECTION OF A TRADE NEWSPAPER FOR HOTEL, RESORT AND RESTAURANT PERSONNEL AND HOSPITALITY EXECUTIVES IN THE FIELDS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND HOTEL, RESORT, HOSPITALITY AND RESTAURANT INDUSTRIES; AND, PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, MAGAZINES AND NEWSLETTERS FEATURING INFORMATION PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRYABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance