USPTO serial 77809802
ONE COMPANY, ONE CHOICE, ONE BILL, ONE SOLUTION, METONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2010
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ONE COMPANY, ONE CHOICE, ONE BILL, ONE SOLUTION, METONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation
Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation
Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD Richard Law Group13355 Noel Road, Suite 1350Dallas, TX 75240UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, the electronic transmission of voice, data, video, facsimile and information; local, long distance and international voice, data and facsimile telephone services; electronic voice messaging services, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; personal communications services, namely, call forwarding services, call management services, call sequencing services and voice mail and voice messaging services; video conferencing transmission services; telephone telecommunications services provided via telephone calling cards; providing telephone conferencing services; providing multiple user access to global computer networks; PBX dialing services; telephone voice messaging services; electronic transmission of data, images and documents via computer information network; electronic hosting services to provide telecommunications connections for transactions on global computer networks; asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) services; multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) telecommunications services; integrated services digital network telecommunications services; wireless electronic simultaneous, bi-directional interactive transmissions of voice, audio, video, data, text, facsimile and information via multimedia networks; fractionalized digital T1 switched voice telephone services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named ONE COMPANY, ONE CHOICE, ONE BILL, ONE SOLUTION, METONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 13, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |