Drawing for OKI DOKI ALL FOR ONE · ONE FOR ALL

USPTO serial 77810107

OKI DOKI ALL FOR ONE · ONE FOR ALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OKI DOKI ALL FOR ONE · ONE FOR ALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John R. Dawson/Elizabeth K. Brock

JOHN R. DAWSON/ELIZABETH K. BROCK HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.PO BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303-0828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020non-metal containers for commercial outdoor use and industrial outdoor useACTIVE—
021non-metal containers for household use; non-metal storage containers for domestic outdoor useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 1, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 25, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance