USPTO serial 77810184
INTUITIVE VOICE NAVIGATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTUITIVE VOICE NAVIGATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Cruz, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle D. Spencer
55 RIVER ST STE 100SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060-4567UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and software applications using speech and/or voice recognition for land line telephones and/or wireless mobile devices in the fields of directory assistance services, travel services, personal shopping and commerce transactions, telecommunications services, restaurant reservations services and event tickets purchasing services; telephone information services about the goods and services of others; voice-enabled software applications for obtaining directory assistance information, personal shopping and commerce transactions, telecommunications services, restaurant reservations services and event tickets purchasing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing information about the goods and services of others using speech and/or voice recognition for land line telephones and/or wireless mobile devices in the fields of directory assistance services, travel services, personal shopping and commerce transactions, telecommunications services, restaurant reservations services and event tickets purchasing services; telephone information services about the goods and services of others; voice-enabled software applications for obtaining directory assistance information, personal shopping and commerce transactions, telecommunications services, restaurant reservations services and event tickets purchasing services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | Computer and technical consultation in the field of computer software development using speech and/or voice recognition for land line telephones and/ or wireless mobile devices; developing, updating an maintaining computer software in the filed of speech and/or voice recognition for land line telephones and/ or wireless mobile devices | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |