Drawing for READYSHIP

USPTO serial 77810266

READYSHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with READYSHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edgar A. Zarins

EDGAR A ZARINS MASCO CORPORATION21001 VAN BORN RDTAYLOR, MI 48180-1300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039EXPEDITED PRODUCT DELIVERY SERVICES, NAMELY DELIVERY OF PLUMBING PRODUCTS AND BATHROOM ACCESSORIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 9, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 9, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 24, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 11, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 11, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 17, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 2, 2011RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 2, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 31, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 7, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 18, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 25, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance