USPTO serial 77810587
DLX DOWNTOWN LOFT EXCHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DLX DOWNTOWN LOFT EXCHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Olivia Goodkin
OLIVIA GOODKIN RUTTER HOBBS & DAVIDOFF INCORPORATED1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSTE 1700LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6031Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Leasing of real estate; Providing a database of information about residential real estate listings in different neighborhoods and communities; Providing a database of residential real estate listings within neighborhoods and communities specifically identified by users; Providing information in the field of real estate by means of linking the web site to other web sites featuring real estate information; Providing information in the field of real estate via the Internet; Providing real estate listings and real estate information via the Internet; Real estate acquisition services; Real estate agencies; Real estate consultation; Real estate listing; Real estate procurement for others; Real estate rental services, namely, rental of residential housing | ABANDONED | Jan 7, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |