USPTO serial 77811194
SECURECENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECURECENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fountain Valley, CA
Fountain Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett S. Adair
17595 MOUNT HERRMANN STFOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708-4160UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for interconnecting and managing wireless and wired local and wide area networks, namely, routers, access points, network client adapters, computer network switches, gateways, print servers and internet cameras; Computer and networking hardware and related software for voice communications over data networks, voice over internet protocol (VoIP) networks, and digital networks, namely, communications switching equipment, network hubs, network switches, network routers, telephone station sets, telephone line interface terminals, wide area network interface terminals and computer terminals for transfer of voice, data, multimedia and other real time applications; Computer networking hardware and software for use in data storage, operation of computer applications and networks, recovery of data, data protection, data back-up, data encryption, data consolidation and data duplication/redundancy and network data sharing; Computer hardware and software used for internet threat management, network security, firewall, anti-virus, parental control, spam control, spyware blocking, phishing control, peer-to-peer control, content filtering, privacy control, identification theft control, network monitoring, application monitoring and application control; Telephone handsets, telephones, wireless telephones, wireless telephones, cellular telephones, mobile telephones, radio telephones, two-way radios, radio transmitters, radio receivers, radio transceivers, MP3 players, and camera telephones; Computer hardware and software for use in connecting computers with televisions, projectors, monitors or other display devices; computer networking hardware, wired and wireless, namely, computers and devices for use with televisions, projectors, monitors or other display devices enabled for receipt and transmission of information, namely, data, text, graphics, images, still and motion pictures, sound, music, audio, video, video games, and signals; wired and wireless digital electronic devices for recording, capturing, displaying, organizing, transmitting, receiving, controlling, playing and/or reviewing text, data, image, audio and video files, namely, personal digital assistant (PDA), digital cameras, digital video cameras, MP3 players, digital audio tape players and recorders; computer hardware and software for the processing, reproduction, conversion and streaming of video, audio and multimedia content; computer hardware and software for controlling the operation of audio and video devices and for viewing, searching, organizing, storing and playing audio, video, television, movies, photographs, music and other digital media content | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |