Drawing for 24 KARAT CLASSIQUE

USPTO serial 77812129

24 KARAT CLASSIQUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 24 KARAT CLASSIQUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paulette R. Carey

PAULETTE R. CAREY BUCHMAN LAW FIRM, LLP510 THORNALL ST STE 200EDISON, NJ 08837-2204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverage produced from a brewed malt base with natural flavors; Distilled Spirits; Liqueurs; Prepared alcoholic cocktailACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 28, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance