Drawing for STRIDEX NATURALLY CLEAR

USPTO serial 77813226

STRIDEX NATURALLY CLEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRIDEX NATURALLY CLEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Burton S. Ehrlich

BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUESUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medicated topical preparations for human use for cleansing the skin, to prevent or alleviate the symptoms of acne and other skin afflictions, for skin care protection, and applicators or pads for the foregoing items all sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 7, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 7, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 2, 2011LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jun 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 21, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 18, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 13, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance