USPTO serial 77813385
MED-ENG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 14, 2012
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MED-ENG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OTTAWA ONTARIO, CA
OTTAWA ONTARIO, CA
OTTAWA ONTARIO, CA
Allen-Vanguard Technologies Inc.
Ottawa, ONTARIO, CA
JACKSONVILLE, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brendan P. McFeely
Brendan P. McFeely Kane Kessler, P.C.600 Third Avenue35th FloorNew York, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective clothing, namely, body protective suits, protective helmets, protective industrial gloves and boots for use by bomb and mine disposal personnel and fire fighters; personal protective clothing for the hands and feet of demining and mine clearance personnel, namely, conical hand protectors, overhand hand protectors, raised foot protection platform for walking; personal protective clothing used to reduce risk of injury from blast and ballistic threats, namely, modular integrated suits, namely, upper body vests, removable sleeves, trousers, groin protectors, neck protectors, helmet-mounted rigid facial protectors; protective clothing used in improvised explosive device disposal, namely, bomb disposal suits, bomb disposal helmets with visors; search suits, namely, body protective suits designed for use when searching for improvised explosive devices; body protective armour for military and law enforcement personnel facing ballistic and [ IDE ] * IED * (improvised explosive devices) threats; personal protective equipment used to protect personnel from heat stress, namely, protective clothing in the nature of cooling vests and liquid circulating garments equipped with mechanical chillers, ice-based chillers, tethers and connectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLEN-VANGUARD CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ALLEN-VANGUARD CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ALLEN-VANGUARD CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Allen-Vanguard Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Med-Eng, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MED-ENG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2016 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |