USPTO serial 77813661
CHRISTIAN PRINCESS DOLLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHRISTIAN PRINCESS DOLLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Bean bag dolls; Bobble head dolls; Bobblehead dolls; Bodhidharma dolls with pupils undrawn (menashi-daruma); Christmas dolls; Clothes for European dolls; Clothes for Japanese traditional dolls; Customized dolls having a face in the form of a particular adolescent who has unexpectedly or tragically died; Doll accessories; Doll cases; Doll clothing; Doll costumes; Doll furniture; Doll house furnishings; Doll houses; Dolls; Dolls and accessories therefor; Dolls and dolls' clothing; Dolls and playsets therefor; Dolls for Christmas; Dolls for playing; Dolls in sitting posture (osuwari dolls); Dolls' clothes; Dolls' feeding bottles; Dolls' houses; Dolls' rooms; European style dolls; Furniture for doll's houses; Furniture for dolls' houses; Girls' festival dolls and their fittings; Headgear for dolls; Japanese traditional dolls; Kokeshi dolls; Paper dolls; Playsets for dolls; Plush dolls; Plush dolls created from children's drawings; Porcelain dolls; Rag dolls; Sakura dolls; Shoes for dolls; Soft sculpture dolls; Stuffed dolls and animals; Talking dolls; Traditionally dressed western dolls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |