Drawing for SEASONED FRANCHISE LAWYERS

USPTO serial 77813764

SEASONED FRANCHISE LAWYERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEASONED FRANCHISE LAWYERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael R. Daigle

MICHAEL R. DAIGLE Cheng Cohen LLC311 N. Aberdeen StreetSuite 400Chicago, IL 60607

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030(Based on Use in Commerce) Dry spice rub for meats and fish; Spice blends; Spice rubs; SpicesACTIVEFeb 19, 2009
035(Based on Intent to Use) Advertising and marketingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2011PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 9, 2011PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 24, 2011PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2011UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Dec 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance