USPTO serial 77813993
PRICEVET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3795286Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 25, 2010
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRICEVET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FLORES, Julie M.
Robert F. Gazdzinski Gazdzinski &Associates16644 West Bernardo Drive, Ste 201Professional CorporationSan Diego, CA 92127Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing comparisons of fees of pet care providers; Veterinarian referrals; Providing price quotations for pet care services; Price comparison of pet care services; bidding quotation for pet care services; conducting auctions in the field of pet care services; Management of computerized databases in the field of animal care and pet care; Business advisory services in the nature of searching advice for the best prices for consumers of animal grooming, veterinary services, emergency veterinary services and general pet care services in the nature of pet walking, supervised pet play and pet feeding organized by geographic area, provider location, provider affiliation and provider name | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 30, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 25, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |