USPTO serial 77814283
RCDP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RCDP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, CA
Woodbridge, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Filip A. Kowalewski
Filip A. Kowalewski Siemens Industry, Inc.3333 Old Milton ParkwayAlpharetta, IL 30005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software to transfer files and firmware to and from devices connected to a network; computer software to configure devices connected to a computer network; computer software for visualizing a computer network; computer software for discovering devices connected to a computer network; communication routers, switches, computers and modems; gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; fiber optic cables, connectors and filters; fiber optical networks comprised primarily of hubs, computer switches and fiber-to-electrical media converters, communication hubs, communication routers and switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; computer network hubs, computer switches and routers having fiber optical ports; computer hubs, routers and computer switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; fiber optical Ethernet networks comprised of communication hubs, switches, fiber-to-electrical media converters, serial to Ethernet servers, communication hubs, communication routers, computer hubs, computer network routers, computer switches and serial to Ethernet servers having mixed fiber optic to electrical media ports; computer network hubs, switches and routers having optical ports; computer hubs, routers, switches, serial to Ethernet computer servers and serial device computer servers having mixed fiber optic and copper ports; video encoders; fiber optic to cable converters; fiber optical to electrical media converters; serial to Ethernet gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; serial device computer servers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; computerized on-line retail store services in the field of fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; online retail store featuring communication routers, switches, gateways, computers, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks; retail store services featuring fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; arranging and conducting commercial exhibitions of fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications equipment for retail purpose on communication media; providing on-line business information services in the field of the commercial uses of fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications equipment; sales promotion services featuring fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications; telecommunications network management services, namely, the operation and administration of telecommunication systems and networks for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems; computer diagnostic services for network system; computer network design for others; computer network consulting services; design, deployment and management of computer networks for others; computer communication network consulting services; monitoring of computer network systems for system failure or decrease in performance; monitoring of the performance and physical structure of a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of computer network systems for security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUGGEDCOM INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RUGGEDCOM INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named RCDP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2013 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |