USPTO serial 77814870
INKJET FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2012
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INKJET FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CPI INNOVATION SERVICES LIMITED
WILTON, REDCAR, CLEVELAND, GB
Conductive Inkjet Technology Limited
Ossett, GB
Other trademarks owned by Conductive Inkjet Technology Limited
Conductive Inkjet Technology Limited
Ossett, GB
Other trademarks owned by Conductive Inkjet Technology Limited
Conductive Inkjet Technology Limited
Ossett, GB
Other trademarks owned by Conductive Inkjet Technology Limited
OSSETT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven War
Steven War McNeely, Hare & War LLP5335 Wisconsin Ave, NWSuite 440Washington, DC 20015Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic apparatus and components, namely, computer hardware, electronic circuits, computer chips, microprocessors, transistors, diodes, light emitting diodes, and photovoltaic cells; electronic circuit boards; printed circuit boards; printed circuits; apparatus for design, implementation and testing of electronic components and circuit boards; printed electronic components, namely, resistors, conductors, capacitors, transistors, thin film transistors, organic field effect resistors, organic light emitting diodes, and organic photovoltaic cells; antennas; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of electrical and electronic apparatus, instruments, components, circuits and circuit boards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CPI INNOVATION SERVICES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Conductive Inkjet Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Conductive Inkjet Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Conductive Inkjet Technology Limited
- Other trademarks owned by CIT TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named INKJET FLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |