USPTO serial 77815041
F.S.C. BARBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with F.S.C. BARBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurence Beckler
LAURENCE BECKLER LAW OFFICE OF LAURENCE BECKLER, PLLC575 MADISON AVENUESUITE 1006NEW YORK, NY 10022-2511Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After shave lotions; After-shave; After-shave balms; After-shave creams; After-shave emulsions; After-shave gel; After-shave liquid; After-shave lotions; Aftershave cologne; Antiperspirants and deodorants for personal use; Bath lotion; Bath oils; Bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form; Body creams; Body lotions; Body oils; Body spray used as a personal deodorant and as fragrance; Body sprays; Body sprays, namely, water in atomized containers used to produce a cooling effect; Body washes; Cakes of toilet soap; Cologne; Cologne water; Colognes, perfumes and cosmetics; Conditioners; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Cosmetic soaps; Deodorants and antiperspirants; Eau de cologne; Eau de perfume; Eaux de cologne; Face and body creams; Facial cleansers; Facial masks; Facial scrubs; Facial washes; Fragrances and perfumery; Hair care creams; Hair care kits comprising non-medicated hair care preparations, namely, shampoos, conditioners, soaps, after shaves, colognes; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair color; Hair color removers; Hair conditioner; Hair creams; Hair dressings for men; Hair dye; Hair emollients; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair sprays and hair gels; Hair styling gel; Hair styling spray; Liquid bath soaps; Liquid soaps for hands, face and body; Lotions for beards; Moisturizing creams; Mousse for hair; Mouth washes; Mustache wax; Nail care preparations; Nail grooming products, namely, tips, glue, lacquer and glitter; Non-medicated body soaks; Non-medicated breath freshening strips; Non-medicated hair restoration lotions; Non-medicated hair serums; Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; Non-medicated mouth wash and rinse; Non-medicated scalp treatment cream; Oils for hair conditioning; Oils for toiletry purposes; Perfumed soaps; Perfumes and colognes; Perfumes and toilet waters; Pre-shave creams; Pre-shave liquid; Preparations for setting hair; Scented body lotions and creams; Scented oils; Sculpting gel; Shampoo-conditioners; Shaving balm; Shaving creams; Shaving foam; Shaving gels; Shaving lotions; Shaving mousse; Shaving preparations; Shaving soaps; Shaving spritz in the nature of a moisturizing solution for shaving; Shower gels; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin cleansers; Skin conditioners; Skin moisturizer; Soaps for body care; Styling clay for hair; Styling foam for hair; Styling gels; Styling lotions; Styling mousse; Styling paste for hair; Wrinkle resistant cream | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Barber shop services; Barbering services; Barbershops; Hair cutting; Hair replacement, hair addition, and hair extension services; Hair salon services; Hair styling; Hairdressing services; Manicuring; Pedicure services | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |