Drawing for BEER SUMMIT

USPTO serial 77815537

BEER SUMMIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEER SUMMIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clinton H. Wilkinson

CLINTON H. WILKINSON LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES A. WILKINSONPO BOX 1426BETHLEHEM, PA 18016-1426UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Beer brewing services for in-house beerACTIVE—
041Special event planning for social entertainment purposes; party planning servicesACTIVE—
043Providing facilities for conventions, corporate sit-downs and events, social meetings and social functionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance