Drawing for VITALERT

USPTO serial 77816002

VITALERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VITALERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Juan M. Maldonado

JUAN M. MALDONADO MALDONADO LAW OFFICES, P.S.CGM GROUP PLAZA, 1590 PONCE DE LEÓN AVE.SUITE 103SAN JUAN, PR 00926

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045Emergency response alarm monitoring services, namely, monitoring of alert devices by a remote monitoring center for the dispatch of emergency public health and security services and notification to third partiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 30, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 3, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance