Drawing for FREEDOM DENTAL PLANS

USPTO serial 77816871

FREEDOM DENTAL PLANS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREEDOM DENTAL PLANS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William E. Chaltraw, Jr.

William E. Chaltraw, Jr. Fishman, Larsen, Goldring & Zeitler7112 North Fresno Street, Suite 450Fresno, CA 93720UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Dental health insurance underwriting and administrationACTIVEJan 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 12, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Nov 11, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 10, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jul 30, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 21, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Jul 6, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 6, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 4, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 3, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance