Drawing for RED WHITE

USPTO serial 77817071

RED WHITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RED WHITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William Chan

WILLIAM CHAN LAW OFFICES OF BILLY CHAN22 BATTERY ST STE 401SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5516UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and bar services; Wine barsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 23, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 22, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 21, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 21, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 21, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 3, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jun 18, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 18, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 7, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 7, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 7, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 5, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 5, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Sep 4, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 4, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance