USPTO serial 77818202
SONICTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SONICTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burlington, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
JAMES R MENKER HOLLEY & MENKER, P.A.PO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233-1715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | multiwall paper bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 17, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |