USPTO serial 77818230
OPEN CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPEN CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Isaacson
THOMAS M. ISAACSON NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG LLP10415 SOUTHERN MARYLAND BLVD STE 100DUNKIRK, MD 20754-2734UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Unified intelligent automation software tools that provide intelligent policy-based governance and resource management capabilities for pools of computing and other information-technology resources, namely, a cluster of computers, a group of computer clusters known as a grid or grids, commercial enterprise and high-performance computing data centers, dynamic, on-demand or virtualized infrastructure and data centers, utility-based computing systems, high-performance computing systems, networked computers, heterogeneous environments, and hybrid operating system environments, in the nature of downloadable computer software that provides a single, secure interface to all of the associated computing resources for intelligent policy-based governance, workload scheduling, resource and energy monitoring, control, management and provisioning by administrators, managers, and end users in the nature of automated allocation of computing resources, analysis of computing resource availability and status information, installation of software and provisioning operating system changes, power management, software upgrades management, accounting and usage management for reporting and billing, third-party application integration management, workload policy management, and job scheduling for both batch and interactive jobs; downloadable computer software for automated governance, monitoring, managing, profiling, and indicating available computing and associated resources, namely, for intelligent automation and management of multiple resources, scheduling, operating system provisioning, power management, and computing resource policy implementation that enables administrators, managers, and end users to automate, control, and utilize multiple computing resources across computer clusters and grids, heterogeneous computers, hybrid operating system environments, high-performance computing environments, and computing networks and for providing data on a cluster, grid or grids, on-demand data center, high-performance computing environment, and computing networks; downloadable computer software for statistical diagnostic and performance monitoring, namely, analysis of utilization of computing resources, analysis of efficiency of use of computer resources, analysis of optimization of computing resources, analysis of fair sharing of computing resources, analysis of load balancing of computer systems, analysis of hybrid operating system environments, and analysis of power consumption in compute environments by organizations, entities, individuals, classifications of quality of service, queues, and computing nodes; downloadable computer software for providing a quality of service for submitted jobs and for scheduling guarantees and job reservations for users, groups, classes, accounts, and levels of quality of service; downloadable computer software for command-line and graphical resource and workload simulation, including simulation of simultaneous instances to explore the effects of configurations and policies on clusters, grids, high-performance computing environments, on-demand data centers, or networked computers; downloadable computer software for dynamic command-line and graphical management of computing resources, namely, management of software licenses within a single computer administrative domain or across multiple heterogeneous computer administrative domains, hybrid operating system environments, file spaces, network-attached storage media, tape drives, processors, memory, disks, network bandwidth, and other hardware resources; downloadable computer software for interface with and collection of end-user commands for job, queue, operating system, power consumption, and system management, for internal diagnostic and logging facilities, and for integration of provisioning managers, billing systems, identity and security managers and databases, and translation of resource manager job submissions; downloadable computer software for peer-to-peer collaboration of multiple instances to provide domain-specific policies and to provide native resource management support | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |