USPTO serial 77818254
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
Moncton, New Brunswick, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Miller
Richard M. Miller EATON & VAN WINKLE LLP16th Floor3 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Laundry sheets impregnated with laundry detergent for use in clothes washing machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |