USPTO serial 77818294
PERFECT 10
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERFECT 10?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven C. Sereboff
Steven C. Sereboff Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 E 6th St Suite 300Austin, TX 78702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Gaming tables, chips, and accessories, namely, chip cases, chip carousels, chip trays, table tops and layouts, card shoes, cut cards, betting markers, money paddles, dice sticks, discard holder; poker tables, poker chips, and accessories, namely, poker table tops and layouts; dice; craps table, chips, and accessories, namely, craps table tops and layouts, craps dice sticks, craps on and off pucks; roulette table, wheel ball, chips, and accessories, namely, roulette markers, roulette spinner dish, roulette wheel, roulette gaming felt, table top and layouts; dominoes; baccarat table, chips, and accessories, namely, baccarat table tops and layouts; pai gow gaming equipment and accessories, namely, pai gow tiles, pai gow table tops and layouts; lottery wheels, tickets, cards, and game accessories, namely, lottery number balls sets, number drawing equipment, ticket mixing drums, and number wheels; athletic equipment, namely, mouth guards, hand wraps, boxing gloves, striking bags, safety and protective pads for boxing, boxing bags, and punching bags; games, namely, board games and parlor games; exercise machines and equipment, namely, jogging machines, rowing machines, stair-stepping machines, stationary cycles, abdominal boards, chest expanders, chest pulls; stuffed dolls and stuffed animal toys; stand alone video game machines; backgammon game sets; bingo game playing equipment, bingo cards and bingo markers; amusement game machines; arcade games; pinball machines; bath toys; beach balls; billiard game playing equipment, namely, billiard balls, bridges, bumpers, chalk, cue racks, cues, cue tips, cushions, tables, tally balls, and triangles; pool playing equipment, namely, balls, bridges, bumpers, chalk, cues, cue tips, cue racks, cushions, tables and triangles; card games; inflatable toys; golfing equipment and accessories, namely, golf bags, bag covers, bag pegs, bag tags, golf balls, ball markers, ball retrievers, ball sleeves, golf clubs, club bags, club covers, club grips, club inserts, golf gloves, golf putters and putter covers, golf tees and tee markers; mah jong games and accessories, namely, mah jong tiles, mah jong tables, mah jong chips, and mah jong dice; tennis equipment and accessories, namely, tennis balls, tennis nets, tennis rackets, tennis racket presses, tennis racket covers, tennis racket strings | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |