Drawing for STORM SHIELD

USPTO serial 77818736

STORM SHIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STORM SHIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Yung

John P. Yung Locke Lord LLP3 World Financial Center20 FloorNew York, NY 10281

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Roofing accessories, namely, heated metal roofing panels designed to help eliminate the buildup of snow, ice dams and icicles that cause damage to the building structure and create safety concerns and help evacuate the retained water on the roofACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 5, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Jan 7, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 29, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 29, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 29, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 29, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 12, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Nov 12, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 26, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Oct 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 18, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 8, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 5, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance