USPTO serial 77818858
HDT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HDT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana L. Tangren
DANA L. TANGREN WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 E SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric generators | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles, namely, utility terrain vehicles (UTVs); land vehicles, namely, recreational utility vehicles (RUVs); ATVs; engines for land vehicles, namely, engines for motorcycles, utility terrain vehicles (UTVs), recreational utility vehicles (RUVs), and ATVs | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | Duffel bags and all purpose carrying bags | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, hats | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hayes Diversified Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hayes Diversified Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named HDT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |