USPTO serial 77819595
AVIOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AVIOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kellie Geyer
19641 Da VinciFoothill Ranch, CA 92610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical and electronic control devices, namely, electrical signal transmitting, amplifying, receiving, and converting devices, namely, cables, wires, connectors, adapters, wireless adapters and control devices for use with electrical, electronic, and computer devices, namely, electrical and electronic signal switches, electrical and electronic signal splitters, electrical and electronic signal amplifiers, electrical and electronic signal transmitters, electrical and electronic signal receivers, electrical and electronic signal wireless remote controllers, and electrical and electronic signal controllers; computer peripherals, namely, keyboards, mice, cables, wires, adapters, wireless adapters, and kvm switches; audio equipment and accessories, namely, audio signal switches, audio amplifiers, audio signal splitters, audio signal transmitters, audio signal receivers, audio signal wireless remote controllers, audio signal controllers, cables, wires, adapters, and wireless adapters; video equipment and accessories, namely, video signal switches, video signal amplifiers, video signal splitters, video signal transmitters, video signal receivers, video signal wireless remote controllers, video signal controllers, cables, wires, adapters, and wireless adapters | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |