USPTO serial 77820105
ULTRA CASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRA CASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Territories, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sergei Orel, Esq.
Sergei Orel, Esq. Law Office of Sergei Orel, LLC7000 Boulevard East, Suite 43-CGuttenberg, NJ 07093UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cases and bags specially adapted for protecting, holding and carrying electronic devices, namely, mobile phones, cell phones, smart phones, portable telephones, media players, analog voice recorders, digital audio recorders, digital voice recorders, video recorders, personal hand-held portable music players, digital audio players for playing voice recordings, MP3 players, MP4 players, digital audio players designed for playing files with .ogg filename extension, WMA players, digital audio players designed for playing files in 3GPP file format, CD players, MD players, audio recorders, digital video players for watching movies, video file players for watching movies, VCD players for watching movies, DVD players for watching movies, digital video recorders for recording movies, and digital cameras with movie recording functions; screen protectors and fitted plastic films known as skins for covering and providing a scratch proof barrier for protection for mobile phones, cell phones, smart phones, portable telephones, media players, analog voice recorders, digital audio recorders, digital voice recorders, video recorders, personal hand-held portable music players, digital audio players for playing voice recordings, MP3 players, MP4 players, digital players designed for playing files with .ogg filename extension, WMA players, digital players designed for playing files in 3GPP file format, CD players, MD players, audio recorders, digital video players for watching movies, video file players for watching movies, VCD players for watching movies, DVD players for watching movies, digital video recorders for recording movies, and digital cameras with movie recording functions; devices and accessories for mobile phones, cell phones, media players, media recorders, namely, hands-free devices for mobile phones, keyboards, batteries, battery chargers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2014 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2012 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |