USPTO serial 77820107
DS. DISTINCTIVE STYLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DS. DISTINCTIVE STYLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Territories, HK
New Territories, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sergei Orel
SERGEI OREL LAW OFFICE OF SERGEI OREL LLC7000 J F KENNEDY BLVD EASTSTE M-21D LOWER LEVEL MALLGUTTENBERG, NJ 07093Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cases and bags specially adapted for protecting, holding and carrying electronic devices, namely, mobile phones, cell phones, smart phones, portable telephones, media players, media recorders, namely, analog voice recorders, digital sound recorders, digital voice recorders, video recorders, audio players, namely, personal hand-held music players, digital voice players, MP3 players, MP4 players, OGG players, namely, digital audio players designed for playing files with .ogg filename extension, WMA players, 3GP players, namely, digital audio players designed for playing files in 3GPP file format, CD players and MD players, audio recorders, movie players, namely, digital video players, video file players, VCD players, DVD players, movie recorders, namely, digital video recorders, digital cameras with movie recording functions; screen protectors and fitted plastic films known as skins for covering and providing a scratch proof barrier for protection for mobile phones, cell phones, smart phones, portable telephones, media players, media recorders, namely, analog voice recorders, digital sound recorders, digital voice recorders, video recorders, audio players, namely, personal hand-held music players, digital voice players, MP3 players, MP4 players, OGG players, namely, digital players designed for playing files with .ogg filename extension, WMA players, 3GP players, namely, digital players designed for playing files in 3GPP file format, CD players and MD players, audio recorders, movie players, namely, digital video players, video file players, VCD players, DVD players, movie recorders, namely, digital video recorders, digital cameras with movie recording functions; devices and accessories for mobile phones, cell phones, media players, media recorders, namely, hands-free devices for mobile phones, keyboards, batteries, battery chargers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |