USPTO serial 77820206
KRRRRISP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3932938Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 2011
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KRRRRISP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas A. Kees
NICHOLAS A. KEES GODFREY & KAHN, S.C.833 East Michigan Street, Suite 1800Milwaukee, WI 53202-5615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | bagged, canned, cooked, dried, frozen, marinated, preserved, processed, tinned vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 12, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |