USPTO serial 77821250
FELONS ANONYMOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FELONS ANONYMOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic publications, namely, books featuring information in the field of ending the cycle of repeat criminal behavior recorded on computer media | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | A series of books and written articles in the field of ending cycle of repeat criminal behavior; A series of books, written articles, handouts and worksheets in the field of ending cycle of repeat criminal behavior | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Inner Mountain Psychiatry, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Inner Mountain Psychiatry, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named FELONS ANONYMOUS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |