Drawing for BRING HOME COOKING HOME

USPTO serial 77821925

BRING HOME COOKING HOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARL III, FRED
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRING HOME COOKING HOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES T. NIKOLAI

JAMES T. NIKOLAI NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU PA900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH STE 820MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3325UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen, prepared and packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; appetizers consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, vegetables, cheese or mushrooms; frozen, prepared and packaged vegetable-based side dishes; cheese; bacon; ham; frozen fruits; and fruit-based snack foodsACTIVE—
030Bakery goods, namely, fruit crisps; fruit cobblers; cinnamon roll dough; cookies; maple syrup; pastry; pies; pizza; and saucesACTIVE—
032Non-alcoholic fruit drinks containing fruit juiceACTIVE—
039Packaging foods to the order and specification of others; packaging merchandise in the nature of foods for othersACTIVE—
040Food manufacturing services, namely, custom food manufacturing services performed to the order and specification of othersACTIVE—
043Food preparation services for third party private label partiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 8, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 15, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 19, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance