USPTO serial 77822318
THE BAWANNA BABES CREEMY WHOPPA WEENIES LLC. BAWANNA BURGERS AND THE MIGHTY WHOPPY MOES (PUB AND TAVERN PARTNERSHIP SERVICE)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BAWANNA BABES CREEMY WHOPPA WEENIES LLC. BAWANNA BURGERS AND THE MIGHTY WHOPPY MOES (PUB AND TAVERN PARTNERSHIP SERVICE)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Bar and restaurant services | ACTIVE | May 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Motch, Jeff W
- Other trademarks owned by Ceko, Anna M
- Other trademarks owned by Motch, Jack B
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named THE BAWANNA BABES CREEMY WHOPPA WEENIES LLC. BAWANNA BURGERS AND THE MIGHTY WHOPPY MOES (PUB AND TAVERN PARTNERSHIP SERVICE)
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |