USPTO serial 77823669
SUVOROV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2011
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUVOROV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Tener, Esq.
DAVID M. TENER, ESQ. CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN & POKOTILOW, LTD.7 PENN CENTER 11TH FL 1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 10, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT" (TA TIRASPOL WINE & COGNAC DISTILLERY "KVINT")
- Other trademarks owned by TIRASPOLSKY VINNO-KONYACHNY ZAVOD "KVINT" (TA TIRASPOL WINE & COGNAC DISTILLERY "KVINT")
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named SUVOROV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |